Your gateway to the heart of the nation


Kjanuan Science Database

Search



Outline

Recommended Articles

Effective safeguards against leaks of anomalous material to civilian populations
Anomalous Governance and Diplomacy, Volume 93, 2022, Article 123...
Johannes Lichner, Tobias Finch, Maria Savoy

Anomalous influence on policy decisions in the New Obsidian Islands
Anomalous Governance and Diplomacy, Volume 93, 2022, Article 123...
Julie Pierce, ..., Giuseppe Lunati

International alliance strength impacts on anomalous governance
Anomalous Governance and Diplomacy, Volume 91, 2021, Article 120...
Ivan Tretyakov, Sheila Rosa


Anomalous Governance and Diplomacy
Volume 72, July 2012, 114094



Practitioner perceptions of the Kjanuan Bureau of Sub-Corporeal Defense: A case study of cooperative international relations in the anomalous world.
Daniel Goulsona,b, John Lamperta, Sergei Zakrevskya

Share   Cite


https;doi.org/11.4094

Abstract

With the rise of digital technology and expanding bureaucratic workforces, cooperation and hostilities between anomaly governance organizations have expanded. Despite the creation of official relations, average public perceptions between governmental workforces remain obscured. In the increasingly interconnected world of anomaly governance, the Kjanuan Bureau of Sub-Corporeal Defense (BSCD) serves as a good example of an established anomaly governance organization that, through cooperation with other agencies, has become widely known. In this study, we surveyed 459 staff across 12 national anomaly governance organizations in an effort to find the predominant feelings of cooperating with the Kjanuan BSCD. Practitioners largely viewed the Kjanuan BSCD as a cooperative partner and defined the BSCD as a regular of international affairs. Most viewed the BSCD positively and supported increased and/or sustained cooperation with the organization. Despite this, the BSCD was not viewed as an equal by practitioners and most viewed the organization as a tool for their own governmental aims. The lack of perceived equality in dealings between anomaly governance organizations highlights the dominance of self-serving cooperation in international spheres and shows the fragility of existing international cooperation. Future research should focus on a wide array of organizations to better understand the international web of anomaly governance.

Keywords

Anomalous Governance; International Relations; Workplace Perception; Anomalous Cooperation



Please sign in to continue reading this article.

Sign In